On this page:

The Scottish Government - one year on

The Scottish Government - one year on

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Nicola Sturgeon MSPA year in Government is a long time, believe me. But when you are at the heart of it all, the time really flies.

There genuinely is so much to do, and so little time in which to do it.

But as we celebrate the first anniversary of the election that brought this Government to power we can look back with a sense of satisfaction on some significant achievements.

  • Keeping health services local and retaining A&E units at Ayr and Monklands
  • Reducing prescription fees
  • Cutting business rates
  • Ending tolls on all road bridges
  • Restoring the principle of free education

Looking ahead, this Government faces challenges and opportunities in equal measure. Everything we do is aimed at making Scotland's economy grow. We have a coherent economic strategy in place, and an agreed Budget.

The concordats agreed with local government have allowed us to freeze Council Tax this year, but the radical proposals for a Local Income Tax should mean a fairer deal for all - based on ability to pay.

Big infrastructure improvements are planned at the new Forth crossing and the Aberdeen by-pass while we are going ahead with the building of a new hospital in the south of Glasgow

Someone will win the £10 million Saltire Prize, the world's leading initiative on marine renewable energy, and when that happens it will be another small victory in the war against the effects of climate change.

And economic health cannot be divorced from the physical health of the nation. There is a pressing need to tackle Scotland's chronic alcohol problem and the emerging epidemic of childhood obesity.

Not least amongst all these things is the ongoing National Conversation on Scotland's constitutional future that has been played out on these pages and elsewhere over the last nine months.

This Government was elected because it had a positive vision of the future. For the voters it was an act of trust, and we want to repay that trust by renewing our commitment to serve the public interest.

Ultimately, it is the people who will decide what kind of country they want to live in, and what kind of Government there will be.

In my previous blog I wrote that being a member of this Government had convinced me more than ever of the need for change to allow Scotland to fulfil her ambition and potential.

The election a year ago was the a first step towards that necessary change. It has been a long journey since then, but a quick one, and a rewarding one.

The coming year will be another step along the way. The time really is flying.

This blog is now closed to further comment.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]

  • 21. sid burnett - aberdeenshire

    Friday, May 23, 2008 06:00

    we all know how stress causes illness and folks on a low low wage dependant on thier transport keeping them in a job especially in the north and the islands must be driven to distraction at the soaring cost of petrol and diesel especially when we are a country that produces oil and manufactures petrol but prefer to give it all away to the government in england with hardly a whimper who cares if trying to manage from wage packet to wage packet gives the scots a headache and all the resulting illnesses

  • 22. Donald - Dumfries

    Saturday, May 24, 2008 07:03

    What a difference it makes to have a Government answerable only to the Scottish people!

  • 23. Linda McLean - Motherwell

    Wednesday, May 28, 2008 17:57

    What happens with a "yes" vote for Independence?
    A recent newspaper article alleged that Westminster can still deny us Independence should it so desire.
    Or insist we have a second referendum to ensure we know what we voted for in the first place.
    If true,I find that insulting.
    What would happen if that condition was applied to elections generally, and not just the Scots.
    Would they dare to have a re-run of a general election?
    I don't think so.
    How much would it cost?
    If Westminster demand that kind of trivia, let them foot the bill.
    England simply wants a different result the second time around.
    Therefore we wouldn't know what we wanted.
    Therefore England would have to look after us a little while longer.
    Just until we made up our minds....
    We will have to make sure that we make the time to vote for the future of our country.

  • 24. David - Edinburgh

    Friday, May 30, 2008 10:41

    Nicola Sturgeon, I notice you have left out a few key events of the past year. Let me mention just a few.

    The SNP refused to use an extra hand-out from Westminster to send secondary school children on trips to learn about the Holocaust as it was intended. Instead they used the money to cover up their terrible budget management and lied to opposition parties to get the dirty deed through Parliament.

    Alex Salmond wasted thousands of pounds of tax payers money on a second home in London he has hardly used.

    The SNP is requiring many postgraduate students to repay loans of up to £2000 instantly. The loans should have been repayable over several years and after graduation. This is despite their election promise to reduce student debt.

    Unfortunately, this list is just a small taste of the SNP.

  • 25. kerr clelland - kinross

    Saturday, May 31, 2008 13:54

    excellent year..........keep up the good work.

  • 26. Colla - the highlands

    Monday, June 2, 2008 15:47

    A great first year.
    Confidence in the SNP's minority government has kept growing.
    The broad church that is the SNP needs to stay unified at all costs - always seeking a consensual way ahead.
    Around alcohol, there is a need to enforce existing legislation. Force by Force, Command Area by Command Area - Nicola should ensure that she and Kenny receive data about all alcohol related deaths and serious injuries and crimes.
    They should also receive statistics every quarter on the number of people reported to the fiscal - and those successfully prosecuted for alcohol-related charges.
    How many licensees have been prosecuted?
    How many adults have been prosecuted for buying for children?
    How many barstaff have been prosecuted for selling booze to people who are already drunk?
    I'm pleased Nicola recognises the seriousness - people will need to see progress.
    Slainte Mhor - and good luck!

  • 27. David - Edinburgh

    Wednesday, June 4, 2008 10:55

    26. Colla - The Highlands

    I agree with you that the government should record "data about all alcohol related deaths and serious injuries and crimes". Unfortunately, despite being in power for over a year and it being a major election issue, the SNP only started to collect data from hospitals in March 2008, rushing through the NHS QIS Alcohol Report in no more than five weeks! This displays a lack of organisation and commitment from the SNP.

    Moreover, the very party that is running Scotland cannot keep track of it's own alcohol bill. The SNP themselves say it would cost over £6000 and require over 100 staff to merely track their hospitality expenses. I can't wait until the next election!

  • 28. John Brownlie - Glasgow

    Thursday, June 5, 2008 09:28

    I think the Government has an uphill task whilst the media adopts a "unionist" slant to any initiatives.

    This is particularly true of the "Scotsman" whose headings often have no relation to the subject in hand but are invariably slanted against the SNP.

    It is difficult to find any initiatives by our Government which has not, automatically, been opposed by opposition parties even when the Scottish population could benefit.

    As the referendum approaches there will be more media "doom and gloom" stories emanating from the unionist camp as in previous elections.

    It is to be hoped that the country-wide Cabinet meetings will generate positive publicity but without balanced coverage from the media the outcome of the referendum can be adversely affected.

    Incidentally, with reference to the posting at 5 above, I feel it is super-critical to view consumption of three pints of lager and a glass of wine, presumably with a meal, over the course of a social evening, as "binge" drinking.

    The last paragraph, however, shows the reasoning behind the statement.

  • 29. Frank - Highland

    Thursday, June 5, 2008 16:59

    John Brownlie,
    Drinking more than 8 units in a session for men has been defined as binge drinking for some time. Page 12 of the recent Scottish Executive report "How Much are People in Scotland Really Drinking?" reiterates this. I think you will find the alcholic content of the Justice Minister's drinking session falls within his Executive's own definition of binge drinking. Pointing this out is not super-critical, just factual.
    With regard to the last sentence of your posting, are you suggesting that facts are unwelcome in the National Conversation if they are provided by Unionists?
    BRITAIN UNITED OR A DESERT

  • 30. livilion -

    Monday, June 9, 2008 13:45

    #29. Frank
    No need to shout.

    The condition of Britain post-Scottish independence I believe is beyond the competency of this forum, but I share the Scottish government's view that even without Scotland's contributions to the former UK, Greater England, or whatever it chooses to call itself, it will manage just fine and dandy but possibly not quite as affluently as has been accustomed to this last few decades.

    Three pints of economy lager beer and a glass of wine over a meal would render everyone over the limit for driving, but I think most reasonably minded folk might consider this level of consumption acceptable for the average male and hardly pass-remarkable.

    This may or may not technically constitute a binge, depending on the strength and measure of the beer and wine, and the physical constitution of the individual.

    No offence, but if you were rude enough to tell me I was bingeing, I might call you a pedantic sweety-wife.

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Page updated: Wednesday, August 13, 2008