On this page:

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament.

National Conversation with Scotland's Institutions

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

First Minister Alex Salmond

As First Minister of Scotland, it is my responsibility to lead discussion and debate on how we can build a more successful Scotland.

This Government believes that independence for Scotland - where we are equal partners with the other nations of these islands - offers the best prospects for growing prosperity in our nation.

I have already said as First Minister that I am happy to test support for enhanced devolution in a referendum, along with Independence.

And I say to those who oppose the restoration of Scottish independence that just as I respect absolutely their right to hold that view, so in return I feel able to require of them a clear alternative which can be put on a ballot paper and held up to public scrutiny.

I say that not as a nationalist, but as a democrat.

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament. The right to choose the future for this country, is their right.

This second phase of the National Conversation is focused on extensive engagement with Scotland's civic institutions who have developed and preserved our society for over 300 years. We have the chance to shape the future of the nation - and it is important that civic Scotland plays a central role.

On a simple level, the institutions - charities, churches, universities, business and the unions - are the main voice of Scottish society. Their members help to shape the opinions that impact across the wider public.

Institutions act as an important interlocutor between the government and the citizen. In a fundamental sense they are Scottish society - and have been so for many centuries.

This is a debate where Scotland's civic institutions can and must play a vital role - in defining the choices and the challenge that we face as a society.

We must take full responsibility for shaping our own future - the future of Scotland. So consider the aspects of Scottish life which could be made better. Be confident in asserting your vision.

To our churches and our faith groups I say, if you care passionately about a humanitarian global role for Scotland, if you care strongly about increasing foreign aid, if you object deeply to the presence of nuclear weapons - then tell us, and tell the people of Scotland.

To our voluntary organisations I say, if you are paying the cost of lottery funding being diverted to London - then speak out. Tell us the progress you wish to see.

And our universities and colleges, seeking more funding but constrained by Scotland's funding structure. The same fiscal straitjacket which constrains Scotland's government - and which constrains our choices as a society.

And our business organisations who want to enhance the competitive advantage of the Scottish economy and recognise that is the root to prosperity, then we should consider the new wealth - the new resources - that Scotland could generate with greater control of our own economy.

To our trade unions, we have to consider what social partnerships are required to create not just a rich country but a rich society.

As we have seen throughout our history, often the biggest steps forward, the most significant progress requires the greatest courage and indeed, often, some plain speaking.

The Scottish Government wants to hear from you about your priorities and ambitions.

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

  • 171. Graham MacLure - Inverurie

    Friday, May 9, 2008 18:36

    Alex, you state,
    "The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament. The right to choose the future for this country, is their right."

    This is not a pedantic trick question but a genuine enquiry from a supportive constituent who has read various opinions on newspaper comment sites.

    Who guarantees this right of self determination?

    Is it as some state Brussels, the UN or as others state does Westminster hold ultimate control over us all?




  • 172. Alan Reid - Ceres, Fife

    Saturday, May 10, 2008 00:08

    As a supporter of independence I am in favour of holding a referendum on Scotland's constitutional future. The people of Scotland have the right to decide the future of the nation. That the people are now regarded (almost universally) as sovereign in this matter is the key and fundamental achievement of the nationalist movement. As such it is vital that a full and frank process of consultation takes place according to a clear timetable. Wendy Alexander's attempt to bounce the Scottish people into a snap referendum is not just a cheap political stunt, it betrays a contempt for the electorate - the same contempt that lost them the 2007 Holyrood election. When will Labour realise that politicians should exist to serve the people and not the other way round.

  • 173. Steven - West Lothian

    Saturday, May 10, 2008 10:40

    James - Hertfordshire, England

    One of these most well balanced posts I have ever read on this subject. It brought a tear to my eye.

  • 174. fiona - Eaglesham

    Saturday, May 10, 2008 15:54

    Independence...to coin a phrase "bring it on"....

    seriously, we need to cut loose from the negativity of unionist party politics.

    Roll on 2011...

  • 175. Ruairidh - Stornoway

    Sunday, May 11, 2008 19:58

    I totally agree with Andrew - Falkirk, who has referred to the younger generation and who must be encouraged to take an active part in the future of their country - 'ask not what your country can do for you etc.' The road to full Independence is inevitable and transcends the viciously expounded rigours of the present expressed by those advocating the status quo. I personally am not anti-English either and count many southerners amongst my closest friends and allies and who are also fully aware of the 'privileged' positions of those Scots at Westminster so reminiscent of the self-seeking expatriated nobility who followed in the wake of James VI (I) all those years ago. Then as now they are in effect voicing betrayal of their native land. The political climate has now changed forever and am fully supportive of our First Minister seeking to strike an alliance with a name synonymous with Scottish Patriotism - Cameron of Lochiel!

  • 176. Thomas Porter - Scotland, Aberdeen

    Sunday, May 11, 2008 20:12

    162. Paul - Glasgow

    With the European Union at one side and Scotland's vast oil wealth on another these are two clear points of what makes this different situations.

    Could go into detail but then I would be repeating myself and I would not want to bore you.

  • 177. patrick jude morgan - bothwell south lanarkshire

    Monday, May 12, 2008 12:44

    First of all let me say that I have never voted SNP in my life. But I am no unionist and I have voted Labour because other things are also important to me. There used to be a fair number of us in Scottish Labour. But when I looked around the other
    day I was on my own.
    I keep wondering why we are the only nation in Europe who,allegedly, are incapable of running their own affairs.
    We need to have a full voice in the EU.
    I really don't much care about having a new head of state. The queen did it from 1603 so she can do it again.
    The UK defence budget is rather large and I feel that I do not want to buy into it.
    I want to see a fully worked out bussiness plan before autumn 2010, then I will probably vote yes to independence.It looks like we may have a nice new and empty passport office in Glasgow which we can move into when we need to print our own passports.
    I would favour tax incentives to encourage people and bussinesses to move to the isles.
    I want to be campaigning for working class values in a new post independence Scottish Labour party.

  • 178. DEREK HARLEY - ABERDEEN

    Monday, May 12, 2008 14:52

    Scotland has never before had the opportunity to vote on Independence and should think carefully about the issues. The economic case for going it alone has already been made, but more important than that is the necessity for our nation to make its own decisions and to pursue policies appropriate to its needs. If you want Scotland to have a voice in Europe and beyond, only Independence will allow that to happen. Shake off the cringe and become a normal nation-on equal terms with England and the rest.

  • 179. Garry Murphy - Norfolk (England)

    Monday, May 12, 2008 23:14

    Are us who are away from home (I.E HM Forces) or those whom like myself & wife having left the forces but have been unable to get back home to our native Scotland, are we going to get our say. And will those whom do not come from Scotland but are either migrant workers or those who have moved up from England going to have a say in what is a scottish matter that should be decided by the scottish people.

  • 180. John Murphy - Paisley

    Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:11

    170

    I was not aware that the union is also to blame for making Scotland the sick man of Europe on top of all our other woes. I was under the impression that health was a devolved responsbility. In saying that, its a pretty good line; "sorry for having a fish supper but the Union made me do it!" I like it. I wonder whats next..."sorry miss, the Union ate my homework."

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

Page updated: Friday, August 8, 2008