On this page:

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament.

National Conversation with Scotland's Institutions

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

First Minister Alex Salmond

As First Minister of Scotland, it is my responsibility to lead discussion and debate on how we can build a more successful Scotland.

This Government believes that independence for Scotland - where we are equal partners with the other nations of these islands - offers the best prospects for growing prosperity in our nation.

I have already said as First Minister that I am happy to test support for enhanced devolution in a referendum, along with Independence.

And I say to those who oppose the restoration of Scottish independence that just as I respect absolutely their right to hold that view, so in return I feel able to require of them a clear alternative which can be put on a ballot paper and held up to public scrutiny.

I say that not as a nationalist, but as a democrat.

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament. The right to choose the future for this country, is their right.

This second phase of the National Conversation is focused on extensive engagement with Scotland's civic institutions who have developed and preserved our society for over 300 years. We have the chance to shape the future of the nation - and it is important that civic Scotland plays a central role.

On a simple level, the institutions - charities, churches, universities, business and the unions - are the main voice of Scottish society. Their members help to shape the opinions that impact across the wider public.

Institutions act as an important interlocutor between the government and the citizen. In a fundamental sense they are Scottish society - and have been so for many centuries.

This is a debate where Scotland's civic institutions can and must play a vital role - in defining the choices and the challenge that we face as a society.

We must take full responsibility for shaping our own future - the future of Scotland. So consider the aspects of Scottish life which could be made better. Be confident in asserting your vision.

To our churches and our faith groups I say, if you care passionately about a humanitarian global role for Scotland, if you care strongly about increasing foreign aid, if you object deeply to the presence of nuclear weapons - then tell us, and tell the people of Scotland.

To our voluntary organisations I say, if you are paying the cost of lottery funding being diverted to London - then speak out. Tell us the progress you wish to see.

And our universities and colleges, seeking more funding but constrained by Scotland's funding structure. The same fiscal straitjacket which constrains Scotland's government - and which constrains our choices as a society.

And our business organisations who want to enhance the competitive advantage of the Scottish economy and recognise that is the root to prosperity, then we should consider the new wealth - the new resources - that Scotland could generate with greater control of our own economy.

To our trade unions, we have to consider what social partnerships are required to create not just a rich country but a rich society.

As we have seen throughout our history, often the biggest steps forward, the most significant progress requires the greatest courage and indeed, often, some plain speaking.

The Scottish Government wants to hear from you about your priorities and ambitions.

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

  • 131. Duncan - Inverclyde

    Saturday, April 26, 2008 23:19

    Alex Salmond is the best First Minister we have ever had. A very talented individual indeed, whom I believe will deliver to Scotland what it so desperately needs. Freedom... Freedom for this nation to act in the best interests of its citizens. Freedom to evolve this great country of ours into something we have always wanted,, and that is choice. To be given the choice to steer our ambitions to develop this land of ours into a proud nation again.
    Yet I hear the faint echo's of the few that are shackled to the auld and ailing United Kingdom. Those that fear being ripped away from this Disunited Kingdom. All I can say to those individuals is,,, clear your head from what has been drilled in for so long and think about how different things can be. Give it a chance,, becouse it is going to happen.

  • 132. Ess -

    Sunday, April 27, 2008 19:56

    The sooner Scots hidtory is taught in our schools the better, in my opinion.

    For the record, Scots fought on both sides at Culloden. It was what is called a civil war.

  • 133. Thomas Porter - Scotland, Aberdeen

    Monday, April 28, 2008 16:30

    128. Anthony - Renfrewshire

    I am inpressed by your knowledge of history and clans.

    I know that Scotland and the rest of Britain have became very much integrated by one another but does that excuse the fact that Scotland and England can do better as seperate Nations?

    Both countires are have very different economies and can we really have an economic policy that can best suit Scotland and England without one side loosing out?

    Scotland is very much dedicated on using the oil money to create re-newable energy resources. So far, West Minister has only decided to build nuclear powers stations.

    Can I ask where the logic on creating nuclear power stations when that to shall run out eventually?

    It is true that my family and my family clan fought against England and fought for Independance for centuries.

    But now it is not about hating one another. It is about what is best for one another.

    And when two seperate countries have different ideas and ways forward can it truely be fair to stay together when there is going to be bickering along the way? Is it fair for the public?

    Can the Union really be worth getting no where for? Because that gentlemen is what is currently happening in the UK at this moment with Nationalist groups currently strong in Scotland and Wales.

    But can I also ask is being a Nationalist wrong? Can wanting the best for your country and your country alone really be wrong?

    We all work hard and hope to bring our families the best. Can we not work for Scotland and hope to bring Scotland the best?

    Same goes for those English/Welsh Nationalists.





  • 134. Andrew Gibson - Milton of Campsie

    Tuesday, April 29, 2008 16:21

    Through-out the ages a nationalist agenda has always been dependent upon dislike, negativity and blame directed at another nationality or social group, in Scotland's case this is the English. Most of us have lived happily side by side with the English for 400 years as part of a Union, to the point that a more ancient identity than either Scots or English, namely British, has been revived. Now a handful of social discontents and political extremists, who's only wish is to exert disproportionate power upon a small nation, which they are denied when Scotland is part of the UK.

    Mr Salmon why is the return of power to Westminster not to be included in your refurendum options when 25% of the Scottish electrote voted for that very thing only ten years ago?

    The worst thing that could happen to Scots if we let insularity, small mindedness and hatred take over our country. Long may the United Kingdom continue.

  • 135. Duncan - Inverclyde

    Tuesday, April 29, 2008 21:18

    130. Sy B Hirnatt.

    I could'nt agree more with your comment.

    Our best interests are better being represented by a scottish government rather than being watered down in westminster.

    The sooner independence comes the better I say.

  • 136. Paul - Glasgow

    Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:39

    Yet another opinion poll, this one conducted by YouGov, puts support for independence at a low of 19% of the Socttish population. Faced with a choice of seperation, the status quo or more powers for the devolved parliament, voters consistently choose the last two options. This is still a reflection of the fact that if the majority of Scots wanted independence then the SNP would have won a majority in the elction. They did not. There surely is no point in calling a referendum and harking on about seperation when the election was only last year and opinion polls consistently put support for independence at a low percentage level. Such a move would represent a huge waste of tax payers money and a monumental waste of time, energy amnd resources.

    Can we move on now please?

    I do not support independence but the SNP is at least providing quality opposition to Labour and that means more democratic accountability. Alex Salmond is a popular leader and many people support him and his party - but obviously this does not mean voters will choose seperation.

    Can we now concentrate on what really matters to people in their day to day lives and let the governement do what it is supposed to do. Namely govern.

  • 137. Thomas Porter - Scotland, Aberdeen

    Wednesday, April 30, 2008 16:50

    134. Andrew Gibson - Milton of Campsie

    First Minister Salmond only wishes for Independance to be the option.

    Why would he want to add more ideas?

    If the Lib Dems/Labour or Tories wish for that to be an option then they are allowed to make it happen like First Minister Salmond has pointed out countless times.

    I will also ask you one question...

    Why can an Independant Scotland not conintue to live happily side by side with the English?

    Are we that uncivilised? Are you calling us barbarians that can not get along with one another?

    Or am I just a Political Extremist because I wanted a party who represented Scotland and Scotland only to continue to support Scotland? Despite being a Labour supporter and Tory supporter not that long ago...

    You really are out of touch with it all.

  • 138. David - Edinburgh

    Wednesday, April 30, 2008 18:44

    I ask everyone considering the question of Scottish independence, or indeed any
    issue, to evaluate the situation calmly and in a scientific manner. We all undoubtedly agree we want the best for Scotland, but the hard task is deciding
    what that is.

    Certainly, things are not perfect now and can be improved, but, as the Japanese proverb goes, 'action without vision is a nightmare'. It is important we all have an understanding of what the choice means and whether or not those
    political changes will bring about the improvements we want in our lives.

    Scotland has a excellent history in finance and Edinburgh is home to many large financial firms and the second largest back in Europe. When Quebec merely held a referendum many banks moved their headquarters to other provinces to avoid the additional risk (for example, the Bank of Montreal is now based in Toronto). No matter what provisions are made for a Scottish
    central bank many firms will take the safe option of moving to London as it is the largest financial centre in Europe. Thus, ironically, Scotland will loose out to England should it disolve the Union.

    As a stronghold of the Labour Party, Scotland has enjoyed many tax benefits, often leading other Britons to claim Scotland is subsidised by the rest of the UK. While a strong Scotland currently benefits the whole of the UK
    and the complaints are hard to justify, this will no longer be the case with independence. Once again, Scotland will loose out.

    One common myth pedalled by many is that immigrants steal our jobs and so disadvantage us. In fact, the opposite is true: their presence and willingness to earn and spend money boosts the economy and with it produces more jobs and an improvement in the quality of life. This was seen in the Highlands with the expansion of the EU. Already the Highlands in fact require more immigrants a many Poles are returning home. The isolationist attitude and exodus of business that would be brought about by independence would only induce a downward spiral for the Scottish economy.

    The danger of nationalist politicians is that they have made a conclusion before considering the facts and consequences of their policies. Any well-reasoning Scot would dismiss independence as damaging for Scotland. While a local
    government can listen more careful to the needs of the people, a local country cannot provide for the people in our global world. Scotland entered into the Union as it was in its own interest and the Union remains mutually beneficial.

  • 139. Mark - Glasgow

    Thursday, May 1, 2008 10:45

    The recent strike at Grangemouth has shown how valuable North Sea oil really is to the exchequer; the merchants of doom who insist that an independent Scotland could not survive financially should take note.

  • 140. Brian - Glasgow

    Thursday, May 1, 2008 12:52

    As a nationalist I initially held reservations about the SNP's 'conversation' and the whole idea of a referendum. As a Scottish democrat I believe in international law and all that is required is 50%+1 either in terms of votes or seats in a general election. I would urge the Government not to abandon the notion of UDI. That said I believe the current SNP Government has beeb very impressive (delievering more in a year than British Labour managed in 10), The SNP's efficacy in goverance has made me more open to the notion of a gradual solution to our self determination.

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

Page updated: Friday, August 8, 2008