On this page:

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament.

National Conversation with Scotland's Institutions

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

First Minister Alex Salmond

As First Minister of Scotland, it is my responsibility to lead discussion and debate on how we can build a more successful Scotland.

This Government believes that independence for Scotland - where we are equal partners with the other nations of these islands - offers the best prospects for growing prosperity in our nation.

I have already said as First Minister that I am happy to test support for enhanced devolution in a referendum, along with Independence.

And I say to those who oppose the restoration of Scottish independence that just as I respect absolutely their right to hold that view, so in return I feel able to require of them a clear alternative which can be put on a ballot paper and held up to public scrutiny.

I say that not as a nationalist, but as a democrat.

The people are sovereign. The Scottish Parliament is their Parliament. The right to choose the future for this country, is their right.

This second phase of the National Conversation is focused on extensive engagement with Scotland's civic institutions who have developed and preserved our society for over 300 years. We have the chance to shape the future of the nation - and it is important that civic Scotland plays a central role.

On a simple level, the institutions - charities, churches, universities, business and the unions - are the main voice of Scottish society. Their members help to shape the opinions that impact across the wider public.

Institutions act as an important interlocutor between the government and the citizen. In a fundamental sense they are Scottish society - and have been so for many centuries.

This is a debate where Scotland's civic institutions can and must play a vital role - in defining the choices and the challenge that we face as a society.

We must take full responsibility for shaping our own future - the future of Scotland. So consider the aspects of Scottish life which could be made better. Be confident in asserting your vision.

To our churches and our faith groups I say, if you care passionately about a humanitarian global role for Scotland, if you care strongly about increasing foreign aid, if you object deeply to the presence of nuclear weapons - then tell us, and tell the people of Scotland.

To our voluntary organisations I say, if you are paying the cost of lottery funding being diverted to London - then speak out. Tell us the progress you wish to see.

And our universities and colleges, seeking more funding but constrained by Scotland's funding structure. The same fiscal straitjacket which constrains Scotland's government - and which constrains our choices as a society.

And our business organisations who want to enhance the competitive advantage of the Scottish economy and recognise that is the root to prosperity, then we should consider the new wealth - the new resources - that Scotland could generate with greater control of our own economy.

To our trade unions, we have to consider what social partnerships are required to create not just a rich country but a rich society.

As we have seen throughout our history, often the biggest steps forward, the most significant progress requires the greatest courage and indeed, often, some plain speaking.

The Scottish Government wants to hear from you about your priorities and ambitions.

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

  • 1. Stewart - Cumbernauld

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 14:15

    I believe a local Scottish Goverment which focuses on the requirement of a local population can only be beneficial against the over-regulated powers of Westminister which is numb towards the needs of Scotland. We, just as any other country are capable of guiding ourselves rather than lead on a leesh by a London bias goverment. And I for one believe its my right being of Scottish decent to choose in a referendum whether I want my country to be independant or lost and forgotten in a country bigger than our own.

  • 2. Irene Audain - Glasgow/Scotland

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 15:05

    I represent a Scottish Childcare Charity; the Scottish Out of School Care Network. The opportunities that we give children today, to enrich their lives, through play, care and learning opportunities out of school, for all ages of children and young people, not only the "early years", will make a huge difference for the future. Children and young people need to feel that they belong to society, and have a part to play in society. If this happens, they will grow up to be involved citizens, rather than feeling left out. Out of school care helps involve chidlren and young people in wider society, especially those isolated through disability, poverty, or living in rural or island areas. The shocking number of families, living in poverty in Scotland has to be addressed now. Yes, we need childcare so that parents can take up opportunities to train, study or work, but we also need childcare and a new type of leisure service for young teenagers so that those children and young people are also given opportunities to play, learn and socialise with others. A truly groundbreaking administration would, for once and for all, make a committment to the children and young people of Scotland and guarantee that they all can access play, care and learning to suit their needs, to help their families and to make children truly part of their communities. Such services should be staffed by trained professionals who are rewarded properly for the valuable work they do. There needs to be investment inbetter wages, better premises with indoor and outdoor play space. Kitchens should be provided, used to provide nutritious food and to teach children and young people how to cook, with gardens and plots to teach children how to plant and grow their own food. Scotland's future artists, writers, actors, parents, philosophers, politicians, sporting winners and business successes, could be helped a great deal by having their talents nurtured now, in services set up for children and young people out of school, with specialists to cater for a wide variety of interests. This is all complementary to formal education, and supports, but does not replace parents in their role of bringing up their children. Children are, of course, the future, but we also need to make their lives in Scotland better now. I would like to make it clear that this post is in response to the invitation for "charities" etc. to join in the conversation with the FM. My statement is about the children of Scotland, not about independence. My statement is intended for all political parties, not support for any particular view, for or against independence

  • 3. G Goodall - Glenrothes

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 15:56

    Perhaps if you were able to demonstrate your ability to govern for the people of Scotland effectively instead of trying to look impressive while ducking direct questions you may get a majority supporting your position.

    So far your main contribution to the debate in Holyrood at question time has been to pass the buck on to the previous administration. Well it won't wash forever. By the next election you will have had 50% of the time in office that Labour and the Lib-Dems have had, so its time to get the finger out and demonstrate that you are serious about leading the country.

  • 4. Tom O'Golo - Borders

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 16:16

    But Scotland is already a nation within the United Kingdom!

    What (reasonably) will an independent Scotland offer that can't ever be available by renegotiating within the UK?

    Why are SNPs polls so low if independence is such a good idea? (Last election about 15% of Scots voted SNP. That means 85% Scots aren't sufficiently keen on independence to get out and vote for it.

  • 5. Niall - East Lothian

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 20:43

    I am glad that the govenrment is at least giving us all the opportunity to comment on Scotland's future. Eveyone I speak to, irresepective or their political opinion, is more positive about our new government and about Scotland as a whole. It makes me feel proud again to live in Scotland with my family.
    As to the low turnout in the elections I hope that the positive outlook will encourage peopel to vote even if it is to vote against the SNP.

  • 6. Gordon McGinn - Troon

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 21:47

    I agree with Stewart of Cumbernauld that it would be very beneficial if all the folk that form the community of Scotland seize on this unique moment and use their democratic authority to ensure that everything and anything that has impact on Scotland is dealt with and resolved by our own politicians within Scotland.

    Mr Tom O'Golo, I cannot ever agree that it is possible to exist as a nation 'within a nation'. By that very definition you are no longer a nation. You have lost your liberty to effectively address and protect exclusively the needs of your nation. You have become subservient to the greater needs of the much larger entity.

    I am so very grateful that at last we have a democratically elected government in Scotland that puts the needs of the Scottish people first.

    One of many examples: Without the current Scottish Government in place vital Accident and Emergency Centres would have been closed. In the previous Labour administration I emailed a ‘Scottish Executive’ MSP directly involved in the A and E decision process. He clearly had no intention of changing his mind, any consultation taking place was purely a ‘jumping through hoops exercise’. I know someone whose life would have been lost had Ayr Accident and Emergency facility not existed. I am disgusted by the indifference of the Labour Executive MSP who had specific responsibility for this remit.

    Unique opportunities may only come once in a lifetime, please let us not lose this moment. I never again want to see politicians in power that put the needs of Scotland second to their own political aspirations or the needs of the greater entity that may compromise the community of Scotland.

    I sleep much easier at night now, very much better.

    Gordon McGinn

  • 7. Midge - SW Scotland

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 22:23

    Listening tonight to the statements from the three unionist parties on the formation of their constitutional commission, I was filled with despair as they don't seem to have moved on from the rather patronising attitude that they will discuss amongst themselves and decide what is best for Scotland. The SNP Government at least are inviting opinion from the country at large and allowing us all - of every persuasion to state our feelings. I think it is a mistake to think that only those who vote for the SNP support independence - for most of my life I voted labour, and I have always been a supporter of independence. I worry that those powers which might be returned to Westminster may involve the establishment of nuclear power stations and the disposal of nuclear waste - we in the south west are already having depleted uranium weapons being tested on our shores - despite the protests of local residents. Labour/Liberal rule in Scotland since devolution has proved to be something of a non event - lets support our present government which is at last putting Scottish interests first

  • 8. Norman Stone - Edinburgh

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008 23:18

    A nation of Civil Servants and Social Workers - with our only material export a catalyst for violence and alcoholism. Do the sums again, they didn't add up forty years ago and are less likely to do today. It's time to forget the politics of the White Heather Club.

  • 9. Bill - Montrose

    Thursday, March 27, 2008 00:17

    Independence cannot come soon enough. What have we to lose?

    Lets join the world and regain our self respect.

  • 10. Craig Cockburn - Linlithgow

    Thursday, March 27, 2008 01:00

    Parties in power might consider elections an inconvenience especially as they might lose, but they are the foundation of democracy. Letting the people decide which party they vote for from the wide spectrum available is the basis of democracy.

    In the same vein, the SNP are allowing a free democratic vote on a multi-option referendum on a range of options, including some which are not SNP policy. The other parties, which just happen to be unionist are not offering such a democratic choice. They dismiss that independence can be an option even when a significant number of Scots want it.
    It's like having a general election but only allowing parties of a particular viewpoint to stand. Hardly democracy and brings to mind similarities with communist states.

    Such parties deny the Scots the option of even saying "independence: no thanks". Such a limited and narrow ballot from the unionist parties isn't democracy, it's little more than party politics and hardly the way to debate our nation's future.

    I say congratulations to the SNP and I say that all parties should support this brave stance - if the unionist have the courage of their convictions they should support a true multi-option referendum and campaign for devolution within it.

    There is really no other democratic alternative.

    Craig

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

Page updated: Friday, August 8, 2008