On this page:

We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Bruce Crawford, Minister for Parliamentary Business

Friday, November 30, 2007

The online conversation is undoubtedly off to a flying start.

Bruce Crawford Minister for Parliamentary BusinessThe 1,000th comment in the National Conversation Blog was posted at 7.26am on Saturday morning. And the conversation continues to grow and expand in new places with the First Minister speaking to a packed out audience at Edinburgh's International Book Festival, radio phone ins and newspaper letters pages fill up with the views of the nation.

It seems that articulating debate on our constitutional future is hugely popular with a poll in a Sunday newspaper this weekend showing that 74 per cent of Scots are in favour of a referendum with the majority believing that Scotland becoming Independent in inevitable.

The Scottish Government envisages a national conversation which will consider the entire range of possible improvements to the current constitutional settlement for Scotland. What is clear is that the status quo is no longer an option and the question now is how much more Independence and responsibility the people of Scotland want to help improve and progress our country? For instance, I want Scotland to have the Independence to decide whether the Trident Nuclear Weapons System should continue to be based on the Clyde.

At the election a few months back all the main political parties made proposals concerning the devolution settlement.

In addition to proposing a white paper on independence which we have now published, the Scottish National Party made specific proposals to extend the devolution settlement in areas such as the civil service, broadcasting and for firearms.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats proposed a new constitutional convention to examine the best way to devolve new responsibilities, including taxation, to Holyrood. They also proposed that competence over the electoral system, energy, transport and marine policy should be devolved.

The Scottish Labour party emphasised the continued use of the mechanisms in the Scotland Act to make any necessary changes. The Scottish Conservatives declared themselves open to a debate about the powers of the Scottish Parliament to secure accountability for raising revenues, as well as for spending.

Since we launched the national conversation many politicians have joined the debate, with some rethinking their position and saying they welcome a fresh look at Scotland's partnership with other parts of the UK. Certainly times change and minds change, and what is important is that Scotland's government encourages the debate and enables political parties, groups and individuals who have a view of the future direction our nation to play a full part in the conversation.

At the end of the day whether the people of Scotland choose full self government as the way forward or seek to obtain new devolved powers for the Scottish Parliament no significant change should be allowed to happen without the consent of the people, that is why we so strongly back the idea of a referendum. We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Before the election we said to Scotland that it was now time to move forward. As we approach our first 100 days of an SNP Government we have done just that by getting on with the job of delivering the SNP programme and fulfilling our commitment to ensure that a full and proper debate setting out how we can choose a new and better relationship with the other nations of these islands takes place. I look forward to the conversation flowing!

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

  • 21. David Robertson - Inverness

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 16:43

    As I understand it, the right to vote in the referendum is restricted to registered voters in Scotland. This includes anyone who may be resident here temporarily with no vested interest in the country and no intention of staying here after it is over. What possible stake could they have in the outcome?

    I suggest we open it up to anyone in the world who can prove a connection with Scotland. This could be someone born in Scotland or with one of their parents born here. They will be affected if Scotland becomes independent since they will lose their right to become UK citizens and obtain a UK passport. I lived in Canada for many years and I know that there is a very loyal Scottish community there who would love to be given a vote. The same is true of the United States, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, not to mention the other countries of the UK. Keeping in touch with the Scottish diaspora is important for the future welfare of Scotland. This would be one way to cement those bonds.

    This is an important step for all of us and we need to do it right, from the beginning.

    The question of nationality has been raised by a barrister/solicitor in another post and I believe it is a vital one. I trust it will be addressed in the coming months and years before the referendum takes place.

  • 22. Stewart - Edinburgh

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 17:23

    The national conversation is a great ida.

    Either for or agaisnt independence , they is a clear willing for the democratic right to say so.

    we anser yes we get independence, we answer no , the question is gone for another 20 years.

  • 23. James Murray - Tain

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 17:58

    This forum is a splendid idea and , and open to all shades of political opinion.
    The s.n.p. government is like a breath of fresh air and has changed for good, the thoughts of the Scottish people. roll on independence

  • 24. David Ardrey - Cumbernauld, Scotland

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 18:07

    Yesterday (21-08-07) Wendy Alexander made a speech that used terminology associated with New Labour. However after reflecting on her speech and reading ‘The Steel Report’ the similarities of some of the content are comparable. Yesterday I accused Wendy Alexander (Post *1224) of running “cap in hand to her masters (New Labour) in Westminster and get them to sanction any policy change to help get her party to regain power in Scotland.”; I was wrong, as well as relying on New Labour she now seems also to be relying on the ‘The Steel Report’ to formulate (diluted) her and The Scottish Labour Parties policies to regain power. Wendy should remember what she stated yesterday “There is little appetite in Scotland for politicians who put their own agenda first”. The phrase Scottish Labour/Scottish Liberal Democratic pact springs to mind.
    I like Allan Steele-Washington DC *1254, I would recommend that all those who are concerned about Scottish politics should read ‘The Steel Report’
    (www.scotlibdems.org.uk/files/steelcommission.pdf), but for different reasons to Allans. By reading the report it will highlight the hypocrisy of Wendy Alexander and the Scottish Labour Party.

  • 25. Alistair Kerr - New Cumnock

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 18:39

    Why are the Unionists so afraid of a referendum ? A referendum seems to me to be a much more objective way of measuring support, or not, for Independence than simply repeating the mantra of there being no support for it in the country.Asking the people their opinion in a referendum would settle the issue once.

  • 26. jack reid - glasgow

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 20:28

    Msps accepted the will of the scottish people in a referendum to create a devolved parliament. If they don't want to be seen as hypocrites they should accept the will of the Scots in a referendum on Scottish Independance.

  • 27. louise - inverclyde

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 20:49

    To all those who think scotland cant afford to be an independent nation i suggest they go here
    http://www.adamsmith.org/index.php/main/individual/independent_scotland_a_road_to_riches/

    read this and then say "we cant afford to be independent." the adam smith institute is not allied to any political party or government. To all those who follow either the snp or labour or whatever your political persuasion GET THE FACTS, NOT THE SPIN OR LIES................

  • 28. Andrew Brown - Bellshill

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 21:21

    Bruce Crawford states the status quo is no longer an option.
    when was this decided. most of the country voted for parties who were Unionist so therefore they were for the staus quo.
    I do not understand seeceding from Westmister only to be governed by Brussels, and anyway would the European Union want us as it my understanding that it is the United Kingdom that is a member not Scotland individualy, so would we not have to make application to join ?

  • 29. ruth - west lothian

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 22:54

    And another thing, i am SICK of having to wait up till 11pm to watch a news programme about my own country's affairs. How refreshing it will be when we are independent and our media is no longer filtered down to us through a UK bias.If it weren't for a certain Scottish inventor the world wouldn't even HAVE television!!!!
    Independence: we CAN afford it, we WILL prosper. We MUST take control of our own fishing and oil revenues. Thank you SNP for being the only political party in Scotland with the moral integrity and honesty to bring us to where we are today. Now let's go the rest of the way.

  • 30. a sweeney - east kilbride

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 23:54

    I think that given the drastic change in Scotlands political system over recent years it is only right and proper to have the independance discussion. A new generation have the right to their voice their opinion, no matter the outcome.

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Page updated: Tuesday, May 13, 2008