On this page:

We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Bruce Crawford, Minister for Parliamentary Business

Friday, November 30, 2007

The online conversation is undoubtedly off to a flying start.

Bruce Crawford Minister for Parliamentary BusinessThe 1,000th comment in the National Conversation Blog was posted at 7.26am on Saturday morning. And the conversation continues to grow and expand in new places with the First Minister speaking to a packed out audience at Edinburgh's International Book Festival, radio phone ins and newspaper letters pages fill up with the views of the nation.

It seems that articulating debate on our constitutional future is hugely popular with a poll in a Sunday newspaper this weekend showing that 74 per cent of Scots are in favour of a referendum with the majority believing that Scotland becoming Independent in inevitable.

The Scottish Government envisages a national conversation which will consider the entire range of possible improvements to the current constitutional settlement for Scotland. What is clear is that the status quo is no longer an option and the question now is how much more Independence and responsibility the people of Scotland want to help improve and progress our country? For instance, I want Scotland to have the Independence to decide whether the Trident Nuclear Weapons System should continue to be based on the Clyde.

At the election a few months back all the main political parties made proposals concerning the devolution settlement.

In addition to proposing a white paper on independence which we have now published, the Scottish National Party made specific proposals to extend the devolution settlement in areas such as the civil service, broadcasting and for firearms.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats proposed a new constitutional convention to examine the best way to devolve new responsibilities, including taxation, to Holyrood. They also proposed that competence over the electoral system, energy, transport and marine policy should be devolved.

The Scottish Labour party emphasised the continued use of the mechanisms in the Scotland Act to make any necessary changes. The Scottish Conservatives declared themselves open to a debate about the powers of the Scottish Parliament to secure accountability for raising revenues, as well as for spending.

Since we launched the national conversation many politicians have joined the debate, with some rethinking their position and saying they welcome a fresh look at Scotland's partnership with other parts of the UK. Certainly times change and minds change, and what is important is that Scotland's government encourages the debate and enables political parties, groups and individuals who have a view of the future direction our nation to play a full part in the conversation.

At the end of the day whether the people of Scotland choose full self government as the way forward or seek to obtain new devolved powers for the Scottish Parliament no significant change should be allowed to happen without the consent of the people, that is why we so strongly back the idea of a referendum. We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Before the election we said to Scotland that it was now time to move forward. As we approach our first 100 days of an SNP Government we have done just that by getting on with the job of delivering the SNP programme and fulfilling our commitment to ensure that a full and proper debate setting out how we can choose a new and better relationship with the other nations of these islands takes place. I look forward to the conversation flowing!

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

  • 141. Review, my apologies - Fife

    Monday, April 7, 2008 15:08

    #140 Eva

    I believe the late Donald Dewar considered that devolution was a PROCESS rather than an end product. The reality of the situation is the the Scottish people did NOT give the SNP a mandate to govern without the will of parliament. The review or commission was set up to look at the way forward. It is clear from the stance of the SNP that the will of the elected representatives is being ignored by the SNP.

    If all this party has to offer is division and rancour then it is failing in its duty to SERVE the people of Scotland.

    At least we are agreed that we have the right to object to behaviour which we see as counter productive.

    When the SNP has a majority in Parliament They can call the tune, in the meantime!!!

  • 142. Dave Eastabrook - Largs, Ayrshire

    Friday, April 18, 2008 03:51

    141. Review, my apologies
    Though on the opposite side of the great Independence debate, I agree with many general as opposed to party-politicking points you make here and in the other blogs on this site.

    However, if indeed "The review or commission was set up to look at the way forward", then it/they must consider Independence as an option to be discussed, as well as any other way forward. If then the SNP refuse to take part, they will be in the wrong. As it is at present, they would be right to refuse, as all options are not to be reviewed.

    (or indeed revued - I suspect there are many Scots and British who regard the whole political thing worldwide these days as a quite poor comedy of errors - I vote Billy Connolly for President, he'd make a much better job of it all!!!).

  • 143. Thomas Porter - Scotland, Aberdeen

    Saturday, May 10, 2008 19:35

    141. Review, my apologies - Fife

    Failing to serve the people?

    Local Income Tax, Cutting Business Rates?

    Sounds abit like they are saving the people money in the face of rising duty of tax that the Government insisits on and of course rising food prices that so far we have only heard words now.

    Course you do not mention thise because you have to be right, despite the overwhelming agruements that show you are wrong and you continue to be selective in the use of facts.

    Can you not just accept that the SNP are doing a good job with a minority Government?

    You complain all the time and that is all you do.

    I do not hear suitable alternatives that suggest you can not do better.

    Let me you guess you are a member of the Labour Party?

    Because all they do is critise without putting up a sensible alternative.

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Page updated: Tuesday, May 13, 2008