On this page:

We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Bruce Crawford, Minister for Parliamentary Business

Friday, November 30, 2007

The online conversation is undoubtedly off to a flying start.

Bruce Crawford Minister for Parliamentary BusinessThe 1,000th comment in the National Conversation Blog was posted at 7.26am on Saturday morning. And the conversation continues to grow and expand in new places with the First Minister speaking to a packed out audience at Edinburgh's International Book Festival, radio phone ins and newspaper letters pages fill up with the views of the nation.

It seems that articulating debate on our constitutional future is hugely popular with a poll in a Sunday newspaper this weekend showing that 74 per cent of Scots are in favour of a referendum with the majority believing that Scotland becoming Independent in inevitable.

The Scottish Government envisages a national conversation which will consider the entire range of possible improvements to the current constitutional settlement for Scotland. What is clear is that the status quo is no longer an option and the question now is how much more Independence and responsibility the people of Scotland want to help improve and progress our country? For instance, I want Scotland to have the Independence to decide whether the Trident Nuclear Weapons System should continue to be based on the Clyde.

At the election a few months back all the main political parties made proposals concerning the devolution settlement.

In addition to proposing a white paper on independence which we have now published, the Scottish National Party made specific proposals to extend the devolution settlement in areas such as the civil service, broadcasting and for firearms.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats proposed a new constitutional convention to examine the best way to devolve new responsibilities, including taxation, to Holyrood. They also proposed that competence over the electoral system, energy, transport and marine policy should be devolved.

The Scottish Labour party emphasised the continued use of the mechanisms in the Scotland Act to make any necessary changes. The Scottish Conservatives declared themselves open to a debate about the powers of the Scottish Parliament to secure accountability for raising revenues, as well as for spending.

Since we launched the national conversation many politicians have joined the debate, with some rethinking their position and saying they welcome a fresh look at Scotland's partnership with other parts of the UK. Certainly times change and minds change, and what is important is that Scotland's government encourages the debate and enables political parties, groups and individuals who have a view of the future direction our nation to play a full part in the conversation.

At the end of the day whether the people of Scotland choose full self government as the way forward or seek to obtain new devolved powers for the Scottish Parliament no significant change should be allowed to happen without the consent of the people, that is why we so strongly back the idea of a referendum. We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Before the election we said to Scotland that it was now time to move forward. As we approach our first 100 days of an SNP Government we have done just that by getting on with the job of delivering the SNP programme and fulfilling our commitment to ensure that a full and proper debate setting out how we can choose a new and better relationship with the other nations of these islands takes place. I look forward to the conversation flowing!

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

  • 1. Madhu Satsangi - Stirling

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 16:35

    Well done to the Scottish government on starting this dialogue. I look forward to the country progressing towards greater self-respect, respect for her peoples and the people of other countries. Self-respect will only come through more say over our lives and the lives of future generations: on tax and the economy, on Scotland's place in the world and her responsibilities. We must have the confidence to rid ourselves of the legacy of empire and oppression and have the sense to elect our head of state. Long live the Scottish republic.

  • 2. David Ardrey - Cumbernauld

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 17:40

    Thanks Louise- Port Glasgow * 415
    for highlighting Annex A: Reservations in the Scotland Act 1998, (http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/08/13103747/9) these areas are still controlled by the Westminster government. Now you know why they are so opposed to ‘Independence’.

  • 3. David Morrison - Dundee

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 17:44

    Must agree with the previous writer; for too long we have been told that we are second class, aren't capable of governing ourselves, need the "English subsidy" to keep us from penury, etc. At the same time, the outgoing party told us we were "the greatest little country in the world". Bit of a dicotomy there then? Best wee country in the world that isn't capable of looking after itself. What was that all about Jack?
    I hope this dialogue will maintain a high level of dignity as befits the importance of the topic and not become a regurgitation of the gospel according to the "Sun" and the "Daily Record".
    I think it was Josef Goebbels who said that if you repeated a lie often enough it would become the truth; to me the Great Lie in this discussion is "Scotland needs the UK to bale it out financially". I prophecy that it will be repeated ad nauseam in this "conversation" but it will be done as a truism, not as a fact. Why? Because all the redtops tell us that! So it must be true! Let's have the grown up facts!

  • 4. Jeff Fallow - Fife

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 18:07

    Those afraid of independence are begining to realise that their fears are unfounded. The old economic fears of 'we can't afford it' are no longer even an argument. The internationalism and multiculturalism of the SNP administration has come as a shock to those who equate Scottishness with kilts-and-claymores parochialism. As more Scots travel abroad and see Europe, they realise what Scotland could be: a partner in Europe as opposed to a region in an outdated Britain.

  • 5. R. MOONEY - AYRSHIRE

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 19:24

    I must agree with one of the previous blogs.
    If we haad control of our destiny we would not have to fight wars on the behalf of others,we could take control of our oil revenues,we could move the Trident submarine base away from Scotland-the River Thames is a big river just next to Westminster, just think of all the tourists it would attract- and have the best health service in the world.
    Remember when oil was first discovered in the North Sea the politicians said it would only last 10 years-that was over 30 years ago!
    A least with the SNP we have a high degree of honesty which is sadly lacking in the other main Scottish political especially Labour.
    PS I know the tories are just as bad, but they have no chance of getting elected, sorry Auntie Annabel but it is not your fault.


  • 6. Kevin Scotland - Stirling

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 19:28

    The Young Scots for Independence was out and about in the Forth Valley region last Saturday to start the National Conversation with the youth of Scotland. The response from everyone was amazing and it's great to see everyone joining in.

    Independence is now in sight and offers the best option for our future.

    For more info on the Young Scots for Independence visit snpyouth.org

  • 7. Jim - Edinburgh

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 22:04

    If the SNP want this "conversation" then they should pay for it - not the Scottish Public - using public money to justify Party doctrine - what an incredible abuse of power Mr Salmond.

  • 8. James Dick - Greenock

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007 23:56

    The Electoral Commission has submitted its suggestions to the Westminster Parliament on the redistribution of Euro-MP's. Not surprisingly despite opposition from all sections of the political spectrum in Scotland we are to lose a MEP.
    This at a time when more and more legislation on how we are governed is determined in Brussels. Gordon Brown seems certain to force through the joining of what amounts to an Euro-constitution without Scotland having a say-or anyone else!
    To stay with the status quo is to accept a lesser say for ourselves and our industry on the World Stage.Our say in our affairs is being diluted every day that we wait.
    We should have the same number of MEP's as Denmark and our own say within the Commission.
    Of course we need self-government, what more is there to talk about!

  • 9. David Robertson - Inverness

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 09:55

    Here is a quotation from a speech made by John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat, in the House of Commons, Westminster, England 1932.

    "I believe that every Scotsman should be a Scottish nationalist. If it could be proved that a separate Scottish Parliament were desirable, that is to say that the merits were greater than the disadvantages, Scotsmen should support it. I would go further. Even if it were not proved desirable, if it could be proved desirable by any substantial majority of the Scottish people, then Scotland should be allowed to make the decision."

  • 10. David Robertson - Inverness

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:02

    Here are a couple of quotations by Henry Thomas Buckle (1821-1862): English Historian, from his "History of Civilisation in England":

    An essential antagonism which still exists between the Scotch and English minds; an antagonism extremely remarkable, when found among nations, both of whom, besides being contiguous, and constantly mixing together, speak the same language, read the same books, belong to the same empire and possess the same interests, and yet are, in many important respects, as different as if there had never been any means of their influencing each other, and as if they had never had anything in common."

    "The Scotch always had one direction in which they could speak and act with unrestrained liberty. In politics they found their vent. Their mind was free. And this was their salvation."


[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Page updated: Tuesday, May 13, 2008