On this page:

Feedback form

The feedback form for this blog has been disabled

We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Bruce Crawford, Minister for Parliamentary Business

Friday, November 30, 2007

The online conversation is undoubtedly off to a flying start.

Bruce Crawford Minister for Parliamentary BusinessThe 1,000th comment in the National Conversation Blog was posted at 7.26am on Saturday morning. And the conversation continues to grow and expand in new places with the First Minister speaking to a packed out audience at Edinburgh's International Book Festival, radio phone ins and newspaper letters pages fill up with the views of the nation.

It seems that articulating debate on our constitutional future is hugely popular with a poll in a Sunday newspaper this weekend showing that 74 per cent of Scots are in favour of a referendum with the majority believing that Scotland becoming Independent in inevitable.

The Scottish Government envisages a national conversation which will consider the entire range of possible improvements to the current constitutional settlement for Scotland. What is clear is that the status quo is no longer an option and the question now is how much more Independence and responsibility the people of Scotland want to help improve and progress our country? For instance, I want Scotland to have the Independence to decide whether the Trident Nuclear Weapons System should continue to be based on the Clyde.

At the election a few months back all the main political parties made proposals concerning the devolution settlement.

In addition to proposing a white paper on independence which we have now published, the Scottish National Party made specific proposals to extend the devolution settlement in areas such as the civil service, broadcasting and for firearms.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats proposed a new constitutional convention to examine the best way to devolve new responsibilities, including taxation, to Holyrood. They also proposed that competence over the electoral system, energy, transport and marine policy should be devolved.

The Scottish Labour party emphasised the continued use of the mechanisms in the Scotland Act to make any necessary changes. The Scottish Conservatives declared themselves open to a debate about the powers of the Scottish Parliament to secure accountability for raising revenues, as well as for spending.

Since we launched the national conversation many politicians have joined the debate, with some rethinking their position and saying they welcome a fresh look at Scotland's partnership with other parts of the UK. Certainly times change and minds change, and what is important is that Scotland's government encourages the debate and enables political parties, groups and individuals who have a view of the future direction our nation to play a full part in the conversation.

At the end of the day whether the people of Scotland choose full self government as the way forward or seek to obtain new devolved powers for the Scottish Parliament no significant change should be allowed to happen without the consent of the people, that is why we so strongly back the idea of a referendum. We trust the people of Scotland to make the right decisions and ask other parties to do the same.

Before the election we said to Scotland that it was now time to move forward. As we approach our first 100 days of an SNP Government we have done just that by getting on with the job of delivering the SNP programme and fulfilling our commitment to ensure that a full and proper debate setting out how we can choose a new and better relationship with the other nations of these islands takes place. I look forward to the conversation flowing!

This blog is now closed to further comments.

Make your voice heard

Blog RSS Feed RSS Version of the latest comments for this article

Comments

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [...more]

143. SATURDAY, MAY 10, 2008 19:35
Thomas Porter - Scotland, Aberdeen

141. Review, my apologies - Fife

Failing to serve the people?

Local Income Tax, Cutting Business Rates?

Sounds abit like they are saving the people money in the face of rising duty of tax that the Government insisits on and of course rising food prices that so far we have only heard words now.

Course you do not mention thise because you have to be right, despite the overwhelming agruements that show you are wrong and you continue to be selective in the use of facts.

Can you not just accept that the SNP are doing a good job with a minority Government?

You complain all the time and that is all you do.

I do not hear suitable alternatives that suggest you can not do better.

Let me you guess you are a member of the Labour Party?

Because all they do is critise without putting up a sensible alternative.

142. FRIDAY, APRIL 18, 2008 03:51
Dave Eastabrook - Largs, Ayrshire

141. Review, my apologies
Though on the opposite side of the great Independence debate, I agree with many general as opposed to party-politicking points you make here and in the other blogs on this site.

However, if indeed "The review or commission was set up to look at the way forward", then it/they must consider Independence as an option to be discussed, as well as any other way forward. If then the SNP refuse to take part, they will be in the wrong. As it is at present, they would be right to refuse, as all options are not to be reviewed.

(or indeed revued - I suspect there are many Scots and British who regard the whole political thing worldwide these days as a quite poor comedy of errors - I vote Billy Connolly for President, he'd make a much better job of it all!!!).

141. MONDAY, APRIL 7, 2008 15:08
Review, my apologies - Fife

#140 Eva

I believe the late Donald Dewar considered that devolution was a PROCESS rather than an end product. The reality of the situation is the the Scottish people did NOT give the SNP a mandate to govern without the will of parliament. The review or commission was set up to look at the way forward. It is clear from the stance of the SNP that the will of the elected representatives is being ignored by the SNP.

If all this party has to offer is division and rancour then it is failing in its duty to SERVE the people of Scotland.

At least we are agreed that we have the right to object to behaviour which we see as counter productive.

When the SNP has a majority in Parliament They can call the tune, in the meantime!!!

140. THURSDAY, APRIL 3, 2008 00:56
Eva - Scotland

#138 - CR Fife -

But I am entitled to object when I see that the Unionist "revue" (your choice of spelling) is hijacked and clearly controlled by Westminster and not by the people of Scotland; funny is it not that your Unionists saw no need for any reconsideration of devolution until the unthinkable happened and the SNP gained power?

139. MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2008 23:06
Dave Eastabrook - Largs, Ayrshire

As I understand it, the three opposition party "Commission" is not prepared to discuss independence, in spite of the fact that a significant number of people in Scotland want independence.

It seems to me that this is similar to trying someone with no option for "not guilty", rather only discussing the sentence, whether confinement, community service, or bringing back hanging.

I personally would boycott such as trial even at the risk of being imprisoned or hanged myself, and would refuse to be consulted by a "commission", that was equally undemocratically directioned.

The SNP on the other hand do seem to be prepared to consider other options, even though clearly in favour of Independence themselves.

I know which party I think best represents inclusive Democracy.

138. SATURDAY, MARCH 29, 2008 10:14
Commission Revue - Fife

#135 Eva

A wee clue. The three parties who form the commission are not committed to separation. The SNP who are committed to separation have opted NOT to be associated with the commission and are therefore not prepared to discuss items that would give the Scottish MORE control over their destiny. (Maybe)

So why complain if the rest of parliamentary representatives meet to discuss options? It's why they were elected, by two thirds of the population.

137. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 2008 01:24
Eva - Scotland

I have visited this site a few times, but am galvanised into action now after reading Press reports on the Unionist Review/Commission or whatever it is that was launched today. I am a committed Nationalist but firmly believe in democracy too. That the Unionist agenda excludes consideration of independence as being amongst the posible best outcomes for Scotland is simply an insult to democracy. Clearly, this Westminster-led review has come about simply and solely as the result of the SNP victory last year and not out of any genuine desire to reconsider the best means of governance of Scotland. I hope that the outcome of that review is a recommendation to further devolve but believe that this latest step by the Unionists is one which can only quicken our nation's path towards the return of self-determination.

136. TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 2008 17:11
John Thompson - Perthshire

the only hope for Scotland is that we get the voting right next time and get a proper Gov.

135. SUNDAY, MARCH 23, 2008 17:03
Michelle - Dundee

I think the idea of the National Conversation is a great one. This gives us a chance to discuss our opinions on the future of our country, whatever they may be, without a bunch of anti-nationalist politicians shouting over us that the majority of Scots don't want independence. Rubbish. Why are they so scared of the National Conversation and of letting us say what we want?
Let us have our say.
Bring on independence.

134. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2008 08:04
sid burnett - aberdeenshire

 

[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [...more]

Page updated: Tuesday, May 13, 2008